Insurance Companies Do Nor Cover Harm Caused by Non-ionising Radiation

Why employers should minimise microwave exposure of their workers? Take a look at the Occupational exposure section of Chronic Exposure.

More about insurance dilemmas in the Disconnect book by Devra Davis.

Please, read it.

The Master Epidemiologist Writes about Radar - from 1997

Professor John R. Goldsmith showed the genotoxic potential of radar installations in his old, but highly relevant paper:

"Epidemiologic Evidence Relevant
to Radar (Microwave) Effects. Environmental Health Perspectives , Vol. 105, Supplement 6, December 1997."

Talking about environment: Why there are more and more weather radar installations and no public discussion about risks? Climate research with microwaves that speeds up climate change?

Khurana et al. (2010) Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone Base Stations. A new journal paper.

Abstract

"Human populations are increasingly exposed to microwave/radiofrequency (RF) emissions from wireless communication technology, including mobile phones and their base stations. By searching PubMed, we identified a total of 10 epidemiological studies that assessed for putative health effects of mobile phone base stations. Seven of these studies explored the association between base station proximity and neurobehavioral effects and three investigated cancer. We found that eight of the 10 studies reported increased prevalence of adverse neurobehavioral symptoms or cancer in populations living at distances < 500 meters from base stations. None of the studies reported exposure above accepted international guidelines, suggesting that current guidelines may be inadequate in protecting the health of human populations. We believe that comprehensive epidemiological studies of longterm mobile phone base station exposure are urgently required to more definitively understand its health impact."

From page 266:

"The BioInitiative Report provided detailed scientific information on health impacts when people were exposed to electromagnetic radiation hundreds or even thousands of times below limits currently established by the FCC and International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection in Europe (ICNIRP). The authors reviewed more than 2000 scientific studies and reviews, and have concluded that: (1) the existing public safety limits are inadequate to protect public health; and (2) from a public health policy standpoint, new public safety limits and limits on further deployment of risky technologies are warranted based on the total weight of evidence. A precautionary limit of 1 mW/m2 (0.1 microW/cm2 or 0.614 V/m) was suggested in Section 17 of the BioInitiative Report to be adopted for outdoor, cumulative RF exposure. This limit is a cautious approximation based on the results of several human RF-EMF studies in which no substantial adverse effects on well being were found at low exposures akin to power densities of less than 0.5 – 1 mW/m2.2,5,22–26 RF-EMF exposure at distances > 500 m from the types of mobile phone base stations reviewed herein should fall below the precautionary limit of 0.614 V/m."

Khurana, V. G., Hardell, L., Everaert, J., Bortkiewicz, A., Carlberg, M. & Ahonen, M. (2010).Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone Base Stations. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, Vol. 16, No. 3, 263-267.

http://www.ijoeh.com/index.php/ijoeh/article/view/1309

----

We have no comments about this paper (M. Ahonen was one of the authors).

Please, take a look at the research overview of Chronic Exposure:

http://www.chronicexposure.org